Trade in Goods: Tariff Liberalization and Rules of Origin (ROO)

This section provides a focused legal analysis of the primary mechanisms governing the physical exchange of goods under Vietnam’s key Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), particularly the EVFTA (EU-Vietnam FTA) and the CPTPP (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership).

I. Tariff Commitments: The Legal Roadmap to Elimination

The core promise of any FTA lies in the legal commitment to liberalize trade through tariff reduction. This process is governed by stringent legal roadmaps embedded within the treaty texts and implemented through binding domestic legislation.

• Legal Basis for Phased Reduction: FTAs establish detailed Schedules of Commitments (e.g., Annex 2-A of the EVFTA) that legally mandate the dismantling of tariff lines according to defined timelines (typically 5, 7, 10, or up to 15 years for sensitive products). Legal analysis focuses on the precise mathematical formulas and safeguard mechanisms stipulated for each stage.
• Domestic Implementation Instruments: For Vietnam, the transition from an international treaty obligation to enforceable law requires the issuance of specific domestic legal instruments. This includes:
  • Government Decrees (Nghị định): These are the primary legal instruments, such as Decrees detailing the Special Preferential Import Tariff Schedules, which formally operationalize the agreed tariff cuts and become the legal basis for Customs authorities.
  • Ministry of Finance Circulars (Thông tư): These provide detailed legal guidance on customs procedures, documentation requirements (e.g., procedures for submitting Certificates of Origin – C/O), and specific interpretations of tariff classification necessary for applying the preferential rate.
• Analytical Focus: Legal scholarship often analyzes the legal congruence between the FTA commitment and the Decree’s language, assessing whether the domestic implementing law fully captures the scope and ambition of the international obligation, particularly regarding exceptions, tariff rate quotas (TRQs), and anti-circumvention clauses.

II. Rules of Origin (ROO) Compliance: The Legal Gatekeeper

Rules of Origin (ROO) are the critical legal provisions that determine whether a product has sufficient processing or content from a member country to qualify for the preferential tariff. ROO effectively acts as the legal gatekeeper against trade deflection.

• Comparison of Definitional Rules: Legal scrutiny of ROO involves comparing the application of three main legal standards:
  1. Wholly Obtained (WO): A clear legal standard for products entirely harvested, grown, or produced in one country (e.g., certain minerals or agricultural goods).
  2. Change in Tariff Classification (CTC): A highly technical legal rule requiring that the manufacturing process in the exporting country results in a change of the Harmonized System (HS) code at the 4-digit (Chapter), 6-digit (Heading), or 8-digit (Sub-heading) level. This provides a clear, objective legal test.
  3. Value-Added (VA): A legal method requiring that a specified percentage of the product’s final value (e.g., 40% under CPTPP for certain items) must originate from the FTA parties. This is typically calculated using the Regional Value Content (RVC) or Minimum Domestic Content formulas, which demand precise cost accounting and legal documentation.
• Sector-Specific Legal Scrutiny (Textiles, Footwear, Seafood):
  • Textiles/Garments: EVFTA often mandates the “yarn forward” or “fabric forward” rule, a strict Product-Specific Rule (PSR). Legal analysis assesses the capability of Vietnam’s legal and regulatory framework to enforce this deep integration requirement and minimize reliance on non-Party inputs.
  • Seafood: ROO often utilizes the WO rule or specific processing rules (e.g., “processing that results in a change of HS code”). Legal challenges concern the traceability and verification mechanisms mandated by the FTA to prove legal origin and processing within Vietnam.
• Legal Hurdles for Vietnamese SMEs: Studies critically evaluate the legal complexity burden on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The need for sophisticated cost accounting (for VA rules) and rigorous documentation (for CTC rules) represents a significant legal compliance cost. Research analyzes the effectiveness of Vietnam’s regulatory support (e.g., simplified certification procedures, self-certification under EVFTA’s Registered Exporter System – REX) in mitigating these legal and administrative obstacles to tariff utilization.

📞 CONTACT LEGAL CONSULTANT:

TLA Law is a leading law firm with a team of highly experienced lawyers specializing in criminal, civil, corporate, marriage and family law, and more. We are committed to providing comprehensive legal support and answering all your legal questions. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

1. Lawyer Vu Thi Phuong Thanh, Ha Noi Bar Association

Email: vtpthanh@tlalaw.vn

2. Lawyer Tran My Le, Ha Noi Bar Association

Email: tmle@tlalaw.vn

Nguyen Hien Mai