Over the past decade, foreign direct investment (FDI) has driven economic growth in developing countries, with governments offering tax incentives to attract capital. However, low-tax jurisdictions often gain a competitive edge. To address tax avoidance and profit shifting by multinational enterprises (MNEs), the OECD introduced the Global Minimum Tax (GMT) in 2023, setting a 15% minimum corporate tax rate to reduce tax competition and promote fair contributions. This article examines the GMT policy, its impact on FDI, and the challenges of implementation.
1. Overview of the Global Minimum Tax
1.1. Concept and key features
The Global Minimum Tax (GMT) is an innovative tax policy framework developed under the OECD’s Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). It is designed to address tax avoidance by multinational enterprises (MNEs) and to limit the harmful tax competition that has undermined the global tax base for decades.
The central feature of the GMT is the establishment of a 15% minimum corporate tax rate, which applies to MNEs meeting specific criteria. The policy seeks to reduce tax-driven distortions in investment decisions by ensuring that MNEs cannot shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions without facing additional taxation.
Key components of the GMT include:
- Income Inclusion Rule (IIR): This rule requires the ultimate parent entity of an MNE to pay additional taxes if profits in any jurisdiction are taxed below the 15% minimum rate.
- Undertaxed Payment Rule (UTPR): UTPR acts as a secondary measure, imposing taxes on low-taxed profits when the IIR cannot be applied effectively. It targets payments between group entities within an MNE that would otherwise escape minimum taxation.
- Subject-to-Tax Rule (STTR): Prioritizing source taxation, the STTR ensures that the country where income is earned can impose a minimum level of tax, even before the IIR or UTPR come into play.
- Voluntary Implementation: Although a global standard, the GMT policy is not a legally binding international treaty. Participating countries retain the discretion to adopt and implement the policy at their own pace.
1.2. Scope and applicability
The GMT primarily targets multinational enterprises with annual global revenues exceeding EUR 750 million. The policy does not apply to smaller companies or certain exempt entities, such as government organizations, non-profits, pension funds, and investment funds.
This selective applicability ensures that the GMT focuses on addressing tax avoidance by large corporations while minimizing administrative burdens for smaller businesses.
1.3. Global implications
The OECD projects that the GMT could generate an additional $150 billion in global tax revenues annually. These funds could significantly enhance public finances, particularly in developing countries, allowing governments to invest in infrastructure, healthcare, and education.
2. Impacts of the Global Minimum Tax on Enterprises
2.1. Tax planning and profit allocation
The introduction of a 15% minimum tax rate directly affects the tax planning strategies of MNEs. Historically, many MNEs have utilized tax arbitrage by shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions. The GMT limits this flexibility, compelling companies to pay a minimum level of tax regardless of where profits are reported.
For example, an MNE with subsidiaries operating in a country where the effective tax rate is below 15% will be required to pay additional taxes in the jurisdiction of its ultimate parent company. This measure discourages profit shifting and promotes a more equitable distribution of tax revenues.
2.2. Implications for transfer pricing
Transfer pricing—an accounting method used to allocate profits and costs among subsidiaries—has long been a tool for MNEs to optimize tax outcomes. However, the GMT significantly curtails the effectiveness of this strategy. By enforcing a global minimum tax rate, the policy reduces opportunities for MNEs to exploit transfer pricing mechanisms to minimize their tax liabilities.
2.3. Strategic adjustments in investment decisions
MNEs often base their investment decisions on favorable tax regimes. With the GMT in place, the emphasis on tax benefits diminishes, prompting companies to consider other factors such as:
- Infrastructure quality: Availability of modern transportation, utilities, and communication networks.
- Skilled labor: Access to a well-trained and productive workforce.
- Political and regulatory stability: Assurance of consistent and transparent government policies.
- Market potential: Proximity to growing consumer markets and supply chain efficiencies.
Countries that fail to offer competitive non-tax incentives risk losing their appeal to foreign investors.
2.4. Increased compliance costs
Adapting to the GMT entails significant administrative and compliance requirements for MNEs. Companies must adjust their accounting and reporting systems to align with the new rules, which can involve substantial costs. Additionally, businesses operating across multiple jurisdictions may face complexities in navigating overlapping tax regulations.
3. Challenges arising from the implementation of the GMT
3.1. Policy uncertainty
For countries like Vietnam, the transition to the GMT raises concerns about policy uncertainty and the potential erosion of existing tax incentives. Delays in issuing detailed guidelines can create confusion among businesses, impacting their ability to comply with the new regulations.
3.2. Preservation of pre-existing incentives
A critical challenge for policymakers is balancing the GMT with commitments to investors who were promised long-term tax incentives. Failing to honor these agreements could undermine investor confidence and discourage future investments.
3.3. Competition beyond taxation
As the GMT reduces the importance of tax advantages, countries must enhance their overall business environment to remain competitive. This includes improving infrastructure, streamlining administrative processes, and fostering innovation ecosystems.
The Global Minimum Tax represents a monumental shift in international taxation, aiming to create a fairer and more transparent tax system. While the policy offers significant benefits, such as curbing tax avoidance and increasing government revenues, it also poses challenges for multinational enterprises and host countries alike.
For MNEs, the GMT necessitates a re-evaluation of tax strategies, investment priorities, and compliance frameworks. For developing nations, the policy underscores the need to transition from reliance on tax incentives to building robust, investor-friendly environments.
______________________
Contact Our Legal Experts
At TLA, our experienced lawyers specialize in diverse legal fields, including criminal, civil, corporate, and family law. We provide comprehensive legal support and personalized advice.
For Expert Legal Consultation, Contact Us:
1. Lawyer Vu Thi Phuong Thanh – Director of TLA Law Firm, Hanoi Bar Association.
Email: vtpthanh@tlalaw.vn
2. Lawyer Tran My Le – Chairwoman of TLA Law Firm’s Members’ Council, Hanoi Bar Association.
Email: tmle@tlalaw.vn
Address: Floor 7, No. 6 Duong Dinh Nghe Street, Yen Hoa, Cau Giay, Hanoi
Website: https://tlalaw.vn/
Hotline: 0906246464
_LTTTra_