In international commerce, construction, and financing transactions, guarantees play a critical role in managing risk and securing performance. Two commonly used forms are the on-demand guarantee and the conditional guarantee. While both serve to assure one party that the other will fulfill their obligations—or face financial consequences—their legal nature, enforceability, and risk allocation differ significantly.
Understanding the distinction between these two instruments is crucial for both beneficiaries and guarantors. Choosing the wrong form of guarantee, or misunderstanding its implications, can result in delays, disputes, and unintended liabilities.
1. What Is an On-Demand Guarantee?
An on-demand guarantee, sometimes called an unconditional guarantee or demand bond, is a standalone financial commitment issued by a guarantor (usually a bank or financial institution), in which the guarantor agrees to pay the beneficiary upon receipt of a demand—without needing proof of default or breach by the principal.
Key features:
- No requirement to prove breach: Payment is triggered simply by a demand in accordance with the guarantee’s terms.
- Autonomous from underlying contract: The guarantee operates independently of the performance obligations in the primary contract.
- Common in construction and international trade: Used to secure advance payments, performance, or bid commitments.
Example:
A contractor provides an on-demand performance bond to an employer. If the employer submits a compliant demand, the bank must pay—even if the contractor disputes the allegation of default.
2. What Is a Conditional Guarantee?
A conditional guarantee requires the beneficiary to prove that the principal has failed to perform their obligations before the guarantor becomes liable to pay. It is often likened to a suretyship, where the guarantor’s liability arises only upon default under the underlying contract.
Key features:
- Contingent on breach: Payment depends on evidence of non-performance or breach by the principal.
- Contractually linked to the main agreement: The guarantee is not autonomous.
- More protective of the guarantor: Reduces risk of unfair or opportunistic demands.
Example:
A supplier guarantees the obligations of a subcontractor. The employer must prove that the subcontractor failed to deliver or performed defectively before demanding payment from the guarantor.
3. Legal and Practical Implications
The choice between on-demand and conditional guarantees significantly affects risk allocation and dispute strategy:
- On-demand guarantees favor the beneficiary: Quick access to funds without litigation. However, they may result in wrongful calls, which the principal must later challenge.
- Conditional guarantees offer balance: More equitable, but slower and potentially contentious if the underlying breach is disputed.
In international practice, on-demand guarantees are subject to the URDG 758 (Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees) issued by the ICC, while conditional guarantees are typically governed by local contract or suretyship laws.
4. Drafting Considerations
The enforceability of a guarantee depends heavily on its wording. Phrases like “upon first demand without proof” signal an on-demand guarantee. In contrast, clauses referring to “breach,” “default,” or “failure to perform” suggest a conditional structure.
Parties should:
- Clearly define conditions for payment.
- State whether the guarantee is independent or ancillary to the main contract.
- Address governing law and dispute resolution mechanisms.
- Consider risk of abuse vs. need for security in high-value projects.
Conclusion
The distinction between on-demand and conditional guarantees is not merely academic—it shapes the risk, cash flow, and litigation exposure of all parties involved. An on-demand guarantee offers speed and certainty for the beneficiary but can be costly or unfair to the principal. A conditional guarantee, meanwhile, offers greater protection to the guarantor and principal but may limit the beneficiary’s remedies.
Legal clarity and precise drafting are key. Before entering into any guarantee arrangement, parties should not only understand the legal form but also align it with the commercial objectives and trust dynamics of the transaction. In doing so, they ensure the guarantee serves as a shield—not a sword—in the event of dispute.
————————————————-
CONTACT LEGAL CONSULTANT:
TLA Law is a leading law firm with a team of highly experienced lawyers specializing in criminal, civil, corporate, marriage and family law, and more. We are committed to providing comprehensive legal support and answering all your legal questions. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
1. Lawyer Vu Thi Phuong Thanh, Ha Noi Bar Association
Email: vtpthanh@tlalaw.vn
2. Lawyer Tran My Le, Ha Noi Bar Association
Email: tmle@tlalaw.vn.
TTT