In a modern economy increasingly shaped by innovation and intangible value, intellectual property (IP) has become a central asset of many businesses. In Vietnam, where economic modernization is accelerating alongside commitments to international trade agreements, the recognition of IP as a valuable business resource is growing. However, turning that recognition into economic leverage requires the ability to measure and assign value to IP assets accurately.
Valuing IP—whether trademarks, patents, copyrights, trade secrets, or industrial designs—is essential in various contexts, including capital contribution to companies, mergers and acquisitions, tax compliance, licensing, and dispute resolution. Despite its importance, IP valuation in Vietnam remains a relatively underdeveloped field, facing both legal and practical uncertainties.
Legal Framework for IP Valuation in Vietnam
Vietnamese law acknowledges the economic value of IP and allows for its commercialization. The Law on Intellectual Property, as amended in 2022, provides that IP rights can be transferred, licensed, and used as assets in business. The Law on Enterprises (2020) further allows individuals and organizations to contribute capital to companies in the form of intangible assets, including intellectual property. In such cases, the value of the IP must be agreed upon by the parties or appraised by a valuation organization.
However, there is no unified or specialized legal instrument that governs the methodology or procedure for IP valuation. Instead, parties rely on general provisions found in laws such as the Law on Prices and accompanying decrees, which permit the use of recognized valuation approaches for intangible assets. These include the cost approach, income approach, and market approach, which are also consistent with international valuation standards.
Despite these references, Vietnamese law does not provide detailed technical guidance or binding standards specific to IP assets. As a result, IP valuation is largely conducted based on contractual freedom and international best practices, with legal validity depending on context and the reasonableness of the valuation process.
Common Valuation Approaches
In practice, IP valuation in Vietnam follows three internationally recognized approaches. The cost approach estimates the value of the asset based on the expenses required to recreate or replace it. This is commonly used for early-stage assets or those without established revenue streams. The market approach relies on data from comparable transactions involving similar IP assets. However, the effectiveness of this method in Vietnam is limited by the lack of a public database or transparency in IP licensing or transfer transactions. The income approach, which is the most widely applied in developed markets, determines the present value of future cash flows expected from the use or licensing of the IP. This approach is preferred for mature assets such as trademarks, patents, or software that generate predictable revenue.
Although these methodologies are conceptually sound, their application in Vietnam often faces challenges due to inconsistent data availability, the informal nature of many transactions, and the absence of qualified IP valuation professionals.
Challenges and Gaps in Practice
One of the main barriers to consistent IP valuation in Vietnam is the lack of official technical standards or a regulatory body to oversee the process. Different organizations may apply different valuation methods, leading to inconsistent results. Moreover, state authorities may not always accept IP valuation reports, especially in sensitive areas such as transfer pricing, capital contribution, or tax audits, where valuations are closely scrutinized for compliance and potential abuse.
Another major issue is the limited availability of transactional data. Many IP licensing and transfer deals in Vietnam are private and not subject to disclosure, which makes benchmarking extremely difficult. Furthermore, there is a shortage of trained professionals who can conduct specialized IP valuations that are both legally defensible and commercially credible. As a result, IP valuation is often based on negotiations, assumptions, or general estimates rather than robust financial modeling.
In tax and accounting contexts, the treatment of IP is still evolving. For instance, how to recognize the value of software developed internally, how to allocate royalties in cross-border licensing, and how to amortize intangible assets remain subjects of frequent debate between businesses and tax authorities.
Recent Developments and Outlook
Vietnam’s commitments under trade agreements such as the CPTPP and EVFTA have pushed the government to strengthen its IP regime. The National Intellectual Property Strategy to 2030 includes goals to promote IP commercialization, develop the IP market, and encourage professional IP services—including valuation. The amended Law on Intellectual Property, which took effect in 2023, reflects a stronger market-oriented approach by enhancing mechanisms for licensing, transferring, and enforcing IP rights.
Looking ahead, it is likely that Vietnam will move toward developing national IP valuation standards, encouraging transparency in IP transactions, and recognizing valuation as an essential step in technology transfer and business innovation. This will require collaboration between legal professionals, valuation experts, regulators, and the business community.
Conclusion
The valuation of intellectual property assets in Vietnam remains a complex and evolving field. Although the law recognizes the legitimacy of IP as a business asset and permits its use in various economic activities, the absence of a unified legal framework and technical standards limits the reliability and enforceability of IP valuations.
Businesses operating in Vietnam must therefore approach IP valuation with care. Where possible, they should rely on internationally accepted methods, involve professional valuators, and ensure that valuations are well-documented and justifiable. Legal reform, professional development, and greater market transparency will be key to establishing a credible IP valuation ecosystem in Vietnam. Until then, valuation remains both a strategic opportunity and a legal risk for those seeking to capitalize on intellectual property in the Vietnamese market.
————————————————-
CONTACT LEGAL CONSULTANT:
TLA Law is a leading law firm with a team of highly experienced lawyers specializing in criminal, civil, corporate, marriage and family law, and more. We are committed to providing comprehensive legal support and answering all your legal questions. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
1. Lawyer Vu Thi Phuong Thanh, Ha Noi Bar Association
Email: vtpthanh@tlalaw.vn
2. Lawyer Tran My Le, Ha Noi Bar Association
Email: tmle@tlalaw.vn.
TTT